CNNMoney.com
Companies Economy International Corrections Pre-market trading After-hours trading Winners/losers/actives Bonds Currencies Commodities Money Magazine Retirement Mutual Funds Taxes Ask the Expert Money 101 Autos Loan Center Best Places to Live Calculators Mortgage Rates Personal tech Big Tech blog Techland blog Sectors and stocks Fortune 500 techs Tech Talk 100 best places to launch Ultimate resource guide Small biz makeovers FSB 100 Ask & Answer Fortune 500 Technology Investing Management Rankings Main Create portfolio Edit portfolio Create Alerts Edit Alerts

Question: While visiting my friend Jenna, I took off my very expensive watch to help her in the kitchen. When I went to put it back on, the watch was gone. Later I learned that Jenna’s babysitter had stolen it, along with some of Jenna’s jewelry, and sold everything at a flea market. I think I should ask Jenna to reimburse me, since the theft occurred in her house and was committed by her employee. My husband disagrees. What should I do?

Our answer: Assuming the thief or her parents aren’t going to make restitution, the first thing you should do is call your insurance agent. Virtually all homeowners policies cover theft, though generally only after the first $1,000. And who, you probably want to know, should cover that hefty deductible?

Individuals have an ethical, and often legal, obligation to provide for the safety and well-being of the friends they invite into their homes. Step through a rotting board and your hosts are responsible for whatever injuries you incur, regardless of whether they knew the board was unsound.

In a similar vein, Jenna is responsible for the behavior of her employee, even if she had no reason to think the babysitter was dishonest. Ignorance and a pure heart don’t wash away responsibility.

But Jenna is your friend - and fellow victim - and those are two good reasons to cut her some slack. So instead of asking her to make you whole, we suggest that you ask her to split your loss with you.

We’re not sure she’ll appreciate how fair you’re being, but she should.

Filed under Uncategorized
Posted 3:12 pm 28 Comments comment | Add a comment

If your watch is worth enough $$ to ask your friend to pay for it - you should have put it in your pocket! Call the girls parents, if they are unwilling to pay for it, consider this a lesson well learned. To file an insurance claim or sue is ridiculous! What kind of cheap friend are you?

Posted By jenny sitka, alaska : October 24, 2007 11:41 am

NO DOUBT—THE FRIEND HAS TO PAY.
IT”S NOT YOUR FAULT OR RESPONSIBILITY.
GET WITH THE PROGRAM PEOPLE!

Posted By Terence Lynch, Kings Park, NY : October 3, 2007 11:36 pm

Here is an idea: confront the babysitter with a tape record (hidden). Get her to admit her theft. Then inform the babysitter that she has 1 week to get your cash or you are going to the police and her parents. Then file the police report and sue the babysitter and her parents (in most cases they are responsible) in small claims court for theft (in most states you can get punitive damages for theft).

Posted By Tony Soprano, NJ : July 23, 2007 5:02 pm

For sure you need call to police!

Posted By preoccupied : July 8, 2007 5:04 am

Let’s see, the baby sitter took advantage of a trusting relationship to advance herself materially. You do the same thing, so now your friend knows that it isn’t just the kid next door who is pathetic. I would gladly pay you for half of the cost of the watch and imagine, in the long run, I got of that friendship for pennies on the dollar.

Posted By Mick, Pittsburgh, PA : July 4, 2007 1:04 am

I cannot believe how incorrect our “Money and Ethics Experts” were on this one. To pass this off on an insurance company is unethical, especially when you know who the perpetrator is. I recommend they redeem themselves next issue by re-addressing this recommendation or CNN/Money Magazine should begin to look for new ethicists.

Posted By Victor, Frederick, MD : June 28, 2007 12:54 am

Bad advice! Filing an insurance claim will require the insured to make a police report. This could mean criminal charges against the baby-sitter and the insurance company will go after her for reimbursement. How about confronting the baby-sitter and parent(s). And next time, put the watch in your pocket rather than on the counter.

Posted By Anne-Marie, Louisville, OH : June 22, 2007 9:33 pm

Oh good grief - Why not just send the friend a bill with your hourly rate for the time you spent “helping” in the kitchen? That should work out to a fair amount.

If you are not going to put the blaim on the babysitter, then it doesn’t belong on the friend either.

Posted By Megan, Chicago, IL : June 20, 2007 1:13 pm

Brian from Boston: it’s ridiculous, not “rediculous”, sorry but I just see this spelled incorrectly all too much. Kudos to the others who spelled it the right way.

Posted By Eric, New York, NY : June 19, 2007 11:22 pm

Here is what you do: Find the girl who stole your watch and kick her a**. Tell her to cough up the cash for your watch or else. Problem solved.

Posted By Yadgyu, Harkeyville, TX : June 19, 2007 10:13 pm

Wow. Who needs a friend like you?

Posted By Megan, Boston, MA : June 19, 2007 7:14 pm

It seems to me that the person really responsible for reimbursing is the babysitter (or her parents, depending on how old she is). I would team up with the friend and call the police!
Also, if the flea market the jewelry was sold at is a recurring thing, you could also consider putting up posters describing the stolen items on the off chance that the person who bought them will see the posters and return the items.

Jenna may be responsible and technically “owe” you the money but I think it would be pretty tacky to ask for it.

Posted By Catherine, Raleigh, NC : June 19, 2007 5:17 pm

It’s only a watch — isn’t friendship bigger than a watch?? If it is, I’m sure you will never have good friends.

Posted By Rahul, Santa Clara, CA : June 19, 2007 5:14 pm

What’s wrong with these people.Have the thief arrested and send her away if she is guilty

Posted By Charley Ebinger Chevy Chase MD : June 19, 2007 4:07 pm

It is unfortunate your watch was stolen in your friend’s home but to file an insurance claim or ask your friend to pay for it is rediculous. If a friend of mine asked me to pay for all or half I would probably pay them and then tell them to move on b/c we aren’t friends anymore.

Posted By Brian Boson, MA : June 19, 2007 3:50 pm

This is ridiculous! The list keeps getting longer: doctors who won’t deliver babies because they are afraid of frivolous lawsuits, 50 million lawsuit because the drycleaner lost a pair of pants, friends never inviting people over again because their petty friends can sue them for insignificant things (such as a watch)… Seriously, even if the babysitter stole a Rolex worth 100k, your friend is a victim as much as you are. Do we really want to be a society ostracized because of our greediness? I think NOT.

Posted By Leticia, Reston, VA : June 19, 2007 12:31 pm

Is it really worth all the hassle and possibly loss of a friendship over a darn watch? Get your priorities straight, sigh, and move on. Putting an insurance claim in will just increase the friend’s homeowners premium possibly get them canceled. Over a WATCH. Wow.

Posted By Dave in Washington DC : June 19, 2007 11:01 am

About your friend’s babysitter, tell Jenna you will go to the police unless the babysitter pays for the stolen watch. And do it in spite of hurting Jenna, your friend. If Jenna throws money at you to cover the loss and makes it 100% whole or even a little better than whole, take her on the offer and buy yourself a new watch.

Moral, always put back your watch once you are in someone’s house. Never leave your valuables around while in that person’s house as snything can happen.

Posted By James Goodwin, Doylestown, PA : June 19, 2007 10:47 am

It’s not as if the crime was committed by a random stranger; the name of the babysitter is known, right?

Place the blame where it belongs. File a suit (small claims?) against the babysitter or her parents. Or better yet call the police and insist on prosecution for felony theft; restitution to victims is often part of plea deals and the little thief will want to plea down to the lesser petty theft charge. Even if no plea deal, at least you get the satisfaction of the thief spending a few hours or days in jail. Watching a known thief get arrested and hauled off to jail is quite satisfying; I’ve been there.

Posted By Mike, Boston, MA : June 19, 2007 10:33 am

I hope I don’t have any friends that would hold me responsible for someone else’s actions. If the watch is that expensive, you should be able to afford a new one. If it is not expensive, it should not be a big issue.

Posted By Brad, Tulsa OK : June 19, 2007 10:24 am

I have to agree with John Nashville’s post.
It is ridiculous to ask a friend to reimburse you for the actions of a babysitter. Come on people! Grow up.

Posted By Christina, Richmond VA : June 19, 2007 9:48 am

Its best not to file small claims with your insurer, so unless the watch was pretty expensive (thousands of $$$), she shouldn’t even file a claim. Frequency of claims is one reason that insurers use to non-renew a policy.

Posted By Michael, Scotch Plains, NJ : June 19, 2007 8:25 am

Hey Don Davis, get a clue to the real world. If criminals could do what you propose, they most likely would not be stealing stuff in the first place!

Posted By shoe in ar. : June 19, 2007 12:05 am

This doesn’t strike anyone as ridiculous? A babysitter is not an employee - at best a babysitter would be an independent contractor. Even if the babysitter was an employee, an employer is usually not liable for an employee’s criminal acts. What kind of preemployment screening would you suggest the homeowner do?!?

Better solutions would be to keep an eye on your watch or perhaps buy watches you can afford to replace in the event of theft.

Posted By John, Nashville, TN : June 18, 2007 10:36 pm

Here’s an idea: Call the police.

Posted By Anonymous : June 18, 2007 10:09 pm

If you and Jenna are really true friends, you’ll be fair to her and she to you. And the fair thing is to split your loss.

Posted By Curt, York PA : June 18, 2007 8:52 pm

If criminals were required to repair all damage they cause, as they should be, this wouldn’t even be an issue. Why should two friends have to replace jewelry that was stolen by a criminal who was caught?

Posted By don davis, NC : June 18, 2007 6:07 pm

If the friend had jewelry stolen also, she is probably making a claim on her insurance and already paying the deductible. Her insurance may cover your very expensive watch as well with only the one deductible.

Posted By Jeremy, Seattle, WA : June 18, 2007 6:07 pm

To send a letter to the editor about Do the Right Thing, click hereTop of page

About the authors
Money Magazine's ethicists are the authors of "Isn't It Their Turn to Pick Up the Check?" (Free Press, 2008). E-mail them at FlemingandSchwarz@right-thing.net

© 2008 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 BigCharts.com Inc. All rights reserved. Please see our Terms of Use.
MarketWatch, the MarketWatch logo, and BigCharts are registered trademarks of MarketWatch, Inc.
Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges. All Times are ET.
Intraday data provided by Interactive Data Real-Time Services and subject to the Terms of Use.
Historical, current end-of-day data, and splits data provided by Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data.
Fundamental data provided by Hemscott.
SEC Filings data provided by Edgar Online Inc..
Earnings data provided by FactSet CallStreet, LLC.